Of course, the righteous nations of the west would never assassinate journalists, except of course when they do – but, you know, it is different because they support an evil regime. In a statement of 8 April 1999, NATO indicated that the Radio Television of Serbia studios in Belgrad would be targeted unless they broadcast 6 hours per day of Western media reports: “If President Milosevic would provide equal time for Western news broadcasts in its programmes without censorship 3 hours a day between noon and 1800 and 3 hours a day between 1800 and midnight, then his TV could be an acceptable instrument of public information“. The RTS station was bombed on 23/4/99 – sixteen employees died. Nobody was held accountable for the attack.
Yes, Milosevic was busy with war crimes. Yes, RTS was instrumental to propaganda supporting them.
So, to recapitulate: journalists who support a government that is criminal according to your laws are fair game – especially if your laws are universal laws that obviously apply to all humanity (such as the Universal Declaration of Human rights or the rulings of your favourite religious leaders). Oh noes you say – human rights are natural rights and supporting them is entirely different to any religious creed. Are you sure ? At the very least it makes for an interesting philosophical debate.
One response to “At least, killing journalists in the name of religion or equivalents thereof is something we can all agree on”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
At least, killing journalists in the name of religion or equivalents thereof is something we can all agree on – http://t.co/MiNXMxYSQj