Comments on: Amarok currently playing status via Psi now almost XEP-0118 compliant http://serendipity.ruwenzori.net/index.php/2008/05/08/amarok-currently-playing-status-via-psi-now-almost-xep-0118-compliant Pseudo-random experience capitalization by Jean-Marc Liotier, just in case... Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:10:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5 By: mbishop http://serendipity.ruwenzori.net/index.php/2008/05/08/amarok-currently-playing-status-via-psi-now-almost-xep-0118-compliant#comment-15445 mbishop Thu, 08 May 2008 18:55:17 +0000 http://serendipity.ruwenzori.net/?p=161#comment-15445 Ah, so after digging around for a while, I found where the artist and title get parsed, and created a patch to add in the album as well (length and track number seem a little verbose for the tooltip) and am waiting for confirmation to post a bugfix to Psi. Ah, so after digging around for a while, I found where the artist and title get parsed, and created a patch to add in the album as well (length and track number seem a little verbose for the tooltip) and am waiting for confirmation to post a bugfix to Psi.

]]> By: mbishop http://serendipity.ruwenzori.net/index.php/2008/05/08/amarok-currently-playing-status-via-psi-now-almost-xep-0118-compliant#comment-15444 mbishop Thu, 08 May 2008 17:08:24 +0000 http://serendipity.ruwenzori.net/?p=161#comment-15444 I'm using the amarok package, and it works nicely, however I still see Psi seems to cut off the rest of the information after artist and title...not sure why that is. Anyway, great work, and glad to see someone else is working on this too! I’m using the amarok package, and it works nicely, however I still see Psi seems to cut off the rest of the information after artist and title…not sure why that is.

Anyway, great work, and glad to see someone else is working on this too!

]]> By: Jean-Marc Liotier http://serendipity.ruwenzori.net/index.php/2008/05/08/amarok-currently-playing-status-via-psi-now-almost-xep-0118-compliant#comment-15443 Jean-Marc Liotier Thu, 08 May 2008 08:34:58 +0000 http://serendipity.ruwenzori.net/?p=161#comment-15443 I was not aware of the age of Psi's tune implementation : of course two years is a long time for that sort of things. And I did not mean to be harsh by stating non-conformance - and the specification does not mention the rating element as a mandatory one anyway. Anyway, yay for the 0.13 update and thanks for posting ! I was not aware of the age of Psi’s tune implementation : of course two years is a long time for that sort of things. And I did not mean to be harsh by stating non-conformance – and the specification does not mention the rating element as a mandatory one anyway.

Anyway, yay for the 0.13 update and thanks for posting !

]]> By: Jean-Marc Liotier http://serendipity.ruwenzori.net/index.php/2008/05/08/amarok-currently-playing-status-via-psi-now-almost-xep-0118-compliant#comment-15442 Jean-Marc Liotier Thu, 08 May 2008 08:32:06 +0000 http://serendipity.ruwenzori.net/?p=161#comment-15442 All my apologies to Remko Tronçon and the other Psi developers : I acted stupidly by posting at three AM half asleep. In my hazy tired mind I did a nice piece of wishful reading of the specification - "Album" sounded better than "Source"... Sorry ! All my apologies to Remko Tronçon and the other Psi developers : I acted stupidly by posting at three AM half asleep. In my hazy tired mind I did a nice piece of wishful reading of the specification – “Album” sounded better than “Source”… Sorry !

]]> By: Remko Tronçon http://serendipity.ruwenzori.net/index.php/2008/05/08/amarok-currently-playing-status-via-psi-now-almost-xep-0118-compliant#comment-15441 Remko Tronçon Thu, 08 May 2008 07:08:40 +0000 http://serendipity.ruwenzori.net/?p=161#comment-15441 Forgot to mention that 'rating' is something that was added only 3 months ago to the protocol, while Psi's tune implementation is almost 2 years old. It just needs to be updated, which I plan to do in 0.13. Forgot to mention that ‘rating’ is something that was added only 3 months ago to the protocol, while Psi’s tune implementation is almost 2 years old. It just needs to be updated, which I plan to do in 0.13.

]]> By: Remko Tronçon http://serendipity.ruwenzori.net/index.php/2008/05/08/amarok-currently-playing-status-via-psi-now-almost-xep-0118-compliant#comment-15440 Remko Tronçon Thu, 08 May 2008 07:06:06 +0000 http://serendipity.ruwenzori.net/?p=161#comment-15440 About that Psi bug: there is no tag; albums are always specified in the tag according to XEP-0118. And about the comment of Psi not being XEP-0118 conformant because it 'ignores ratings': as a client, you are free to send and display whatever information you want, so claiming it's non-conformant is a bit harsh ;-) About that Psi bug: there is no tag; albums are always specified in the tag according to XEP-0118.

And about the comment of Psi not being XEP-0118 conformant because it ‘ignores ratings’: as a client, you are free to send and display whatever information you want, so claiming it’s non-conformant is a bit harsh ;-)

]]>